Site icon The Responsive Classroom

The Power of Alliances: Equity in Responses

How do you feel when you know that you and your boss are on the same team, working towards to the same goal? Are you inspired? Do you work harder? Do you push through even when you’re tired or worn down? Do you stay positive, even when the work is difficult? Do you give grace?

But let’s say the opposite is your situation. Let’s say that you feel like your boss is out to get you. That your boss only cares about you getting done what he or she has asked you to do. That your boss doesn’t care about your ideas or your thoughts and is actually constantly waiting for you to do something wrong.

This is the power of an alliance. But think: how much more powerful is it when we are talking about a teacher/student relationship! Building an alliance is the foundational piece of culturally competency and responsiveness, and opens the door to endless opportunities for learning. When students know that the teacher and student are working together to meet common goals as opposed to the idea that the teacher is out to get the student, the affective filter begins to lower, and students are open to so much more learning.

One way to build alliances is to be intentional about equity in relationships. Over 30 years ago, the Los Angeles County Office of Education decided to tackle the problem of inequities in relationships between students and teachers. Using research, they identified 15 interactions that connect to student learning. These are called Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement, or TESA. They contain 3 main strands, with related interactions:

  1. Response Opportunities
    • Equitable Distribution
    • Individual Help
    • Latency
    • Delving
    • Higher-Level Questioning
  2. Feedback
    • Affirm/Correct
    • Praise
    • Reasons for Praise
    • Listening
    • Accepting Feelings
  3. Personal Regard
    • Proximity
    • Courtesy
    • Personal interest and compliments
    • Touch
    • Desist

For the next few blogs, I’m going to take a deeper look at each of these strands, but I want to start with response opportunities. The overarching question here is “Does each student have an equitable opportunity to answer the same amount and level of questions, and am I making the thinking needed to answer the questions accessible?”

Each of the interactions creates a way to intentionally answer this question.

  1. Equitable Distributionthe teacher makes a way for every student to answer or perform in classroom learning situations. Students think and learn differently. If we are only teaching to one type of learning modality, we may not be giving students equal opportunities. Students also process differently. If we are only asking whole group questions and calling on the first 3 students who raise their hand, we are probably cutting off the thinking and processing for students who take a little longer. Here are a few ideas for ensuring we give equitable distribution:

2. Individual HelpDoes each student get equitable opportunities for individual help (and, if one student needs more help than another student in order to access the content, does he receive it? Here are a few ideas:

I want to help, but I will ask you these questions first. Please ask yourself first and see if you can find the answer before asking me.

By implementing this type of a system, students will eventually be able to help themselves more, and leave you available to help those who really need it.

3. LatencyThe teacher allows the student enought time to think over the question before assisting or ending the opportunity to respond. How quickly do you move on from a student after asking them a question? Here are a few suggestions for providing latency:

*Don’t ask questions to students who are off-task. There are other ways to redirect without embarrassment. You risk shutting students down, and this doesn’t accomplish anyone’s goals.

4. Delving, Rephrasing and Giving Cluesthe teacher is able to provide additional information to help the student respond. Here are some suggestions:

5. Higher-level Questioning – the teacher asks challenging questions that require the students to do more than simply recall. We want to make sure that all students are given equitable opportunities to think at higher levels.

The name of the game with being a culturally responsive teacher is intentionality, and these steps can help you plan equity in interactions into your day-to-day classtime.

How would having equity in interactions build alliances, and in turn, increase learning?

How would not having equity in interactions hurt alliances, and in turn, decrease learning?

You’ve got this!

If you want more ideas for building alliances, click here to get info on our Summer Workshop: The Power of Building Alliances!

Exit mobile version